UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrant x                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600

Walnut Creek, California 94597

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Monday, February 10, 2014, 10:30 A.M.

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Central Garden & Pet Company will be held at the LAFAYETTE PARK HOTEL, 3287 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Lafayette, California, on Monday, February 10, 2014, at 10:30 A.M. for the following purposes:

Only holders of record of Common Stock and Class B Stock on the books of the Company as of 5:00 P.M., December 12, 2013, will be entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournment thereof. Holders of Class A Common Stock are welcome to attend and participate in this meeting. A complete list of the Company’s stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for ten days prior to the meeting during normal business hours at the Company’s principal executive offices at 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California.

Except for those stockholders who have already requested printed copies of the Company’s proxy materials, the Company is furnishing proxy materials for this annual meeting to stockholders through the Internet. On or about December 27, 2013, the Company mailed to stockholders on the record date a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”). Certain stockholders who previously requested email notice in lieu of mail received the Notice by email. If a stockholder received a Notice by mail or email, that stockholder will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless such stockholder specifically requests one. Instead, the Notice instructs stockholders on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2013 (which the Company posted on the Internet on December 27, 2013), as well as how to submit proxies over the Internet. The Company believes that mailing or emailing the Notice and posting other materials on the Internet allow it to provide stockholders with the information they need while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. If a stockholder received the Notice and would still like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, such stockholder may request a printed copy of the proxy materials by any of the following methods: through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com; by telephone at 1-800-579-1639; or by sending an email to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote as soon as possible in accordance with the instructions provided to you to ensure that your vote is counted at the annual meeting.

Dated:  December 27, 2013

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600

Walnut Creek, California 94597

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors of Central Garden & Pet Company (the “Company”) is soliciting proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on February 10, 2014 (the “Annual Meeting”), for the purposes set forth in the foregoing notice. This proxy statement and, in the case of holders of Common Stock and Class B Stock, the form of proxy were first sent to stockholders on or about December 27, 2013. Holders of Class A Common Stock will receive this proxy statement but will not be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment thereof.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company has elected to provide access to proxy materials (consisting of the Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2013, as filed with the SEC on December 12, 2013), over the Internet. Therefore, the Company is sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to its stockholders. Starting on the date of distribution of the Notice, all stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request printed copies may be found in the Notice. If a Class B or Common stockholder requests printed versions of the proxy materials by mail, the materials will also include a proxy card or other voting instruction form.

If a Class B or Common stockholder holds shares in its own name as a stockholder of record, such Class B or Common stockholder may vote shares either in person at the meeting or by proxy. To vote in person, Class B or Common stockholders should bring a form of identification, such as a valid driver’s license or passport, and proof that they were a stockholder as of December 12, 2013, and the Company will provide a ballot when such stockholders arrive. To vote by proxy, Class B or Common stockholders should vote in one of the following ways:

Voting by proxy will not affect the right of Class B or Common stockholders to vote shares if they attend the Annual Meeting and want to vote in person—by voting in person such Class B or Common stockholders automatically revoke their proxy. Class B or Common stockholders may also revoke a proxy at any time before the applicable voting deadline by giving the Company’s Secretary written notice of revocation, by submitting a later-dated proxy card or by voting again using the telephone or Internet (the latest telephone or Internet proxy is the one that will be counted).

If you vote by proxy, the individuals named as proxyholders will vote the shares as instructed. If a Class B or Common stockholder votes shares over the telephone, such Class B or Common stockholder must select a voting option (“For” or “Withhold” (for directors) and “For,” “Against” or “Abstain” (for Proposals Two and Three)) in order for the proxy to be counted on that matter. If a Class B or Common stockholder validly votes

shares over the Internet or by mail but does not provide any voting instructions, the individuals named as proxyholders will vote such shares FOR the election of the nominees for director, FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 27, 2014, and FOR the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

If shares are registered in street name, Class B or Common stockholders must vote shares in the manner prescribed by the broker, bank or other nominee. In most instances, a Class B or Common stockholder can do this over the telephone or Internet, or if a Class B or Common stockholder has received or requested a hard copy of the proxy statement and accompanying voting instruction form, the Class B or Common stockholder may mark, sign, date and mail the voting instruction form in the envelope the broker, bank or other nominee provides. The materials that were sent to Class B or Common stockholders have specific instructions for how to submit votes and the deadline for doing so. If a Class B or Common stockholder would like to revoke its proxy, such Class B or Common stockholder must follow the broker, bank or other nominee’s instructions on how to do so. If a Class B or Common stockholder wishes to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, such Class B or Common stockholder must obtain a legal proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee holding the shares.

VOTING SECURITIES

Only stockholders of record of Common Stock and Class B Stock on the books of the Company as of 5:00 P.M., December 12, 2013, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

As of the close of business on December 12, 2013, there were outstanding 12,246,751 shares of Common Stock of the Company, entitled to one vote per share, and 1,652,262 shares of Class B Stock of the Company, entitled to the lesser of ten votes per share or 49% of the total votes cast. There were also outstanding 35,392,503 shares of Class A Common Stock, which generally have no voting rights unless otherwise required by Delaware law. Holders of Common Stock and Class B Stock will vote together on all matters presented to the stockholders for their vote or approval at the meeting.

The holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock and Class B Stock of the Company entitled to vote, present in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by the election inspector appointed for the meeting and will determine whether or not a quorum is present. The election inspector will treat abstentions and broker non-votes as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but as unvoted for purposes of determining the approval of any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote. Under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, stockholders are not entitled to dissenter’s rights with respect to any matter to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting, and we will not independently provide stockholders with any such right.

With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast “For” or “Withhold” for each nominee; votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect. The directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. As a result, if you withhold your authority to vote for any nominee, your vote will not count for or against the nominee, nor will a broker “non-vote” affect the outcome of the election.

Proposal Three is a non-binding vote. However, the Board of Directors of the Company will consider whether or not stockholders approve the compensation of executives as described in this Proxy Statement when making future determinations on executive compensation.

The other matters submitted for stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting will be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter. Abstentions are included in the determination of shares present for quorum purposes.

2

If a stockholder’s shares are held in street name and the stockholder does not instruct his or her broker how to vote the shares, the brokerage firm, in its discretion, may either leave the shares unvoted or vote the shares on routine matters. The proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year should be treated as a routine matter. To the extent a stockholder’s brokerage firm votes shares on the stockholder’s behalf on that proposal, the shares also will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum.

In order to reduce printing and postage costs for stockholders who request a printed copy of the proxy materials, only one Annual Report and one Proxy Statement will be mailed to multiple stockholders who request a printed copy of the proxy materials sharing an address unless we receive contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders sharing an address. This practice is commonly referred to as “householding.” If your household has received only one Annual Report and one Proxy Statement, we will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Annual Report and the Proxy Statement to any stockholder who sends a written request to Investor Relations at our executive offices, which are located at 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94597, or calls (925) 948-4000 and requests such a delivery. If your household is receiving multiple copies of our annual reports or proxy statements and you wish to request delivery of a single copy, you may send a written request to our executive offices at 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94597, or call (925) 948-4000 with such a request.

3

PROPOSAL ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The persons named below are nominees for director to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors shall have been elected. The nominees are all members of the present Board of Directors. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, shares represented by proxy will be voted for the election of all such nominees to the Board of Directors. If any nominee is unable or unwilling to be a candidate for the office of director at the date of the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, the proxies will vote for such substitute nominee as shall be designated by the proxies. Management has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. Set forth below is certain information concerning the nominees which is based on data furnished by them.

4

5

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.

6

FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Board Independence

Upon consideration of the criteria and requirements regarding director independence set forth in NASDAQ Rule 5605, the Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Balousek, Chichester and Piergallini and Ms. Springer meet the standards of independence established by the NASDAQ.

Board Leadership Structure

Under our current leadership structure, the Company has separated the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. William Brown has served as Chairman since founding the Company in 1980, and John Ranelli has served as Chief Executive Officer since February 2013. The Board has determined that separating the roles was appropriate given the differences between the two roles as they are presently defined. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting our strategic direction and for our day-to-day leadership and performance, while the Chairman provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer and leads the Board. In addition, because Mr. Brown is not “independent” within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards, the Board has selected a director who is independent to serve as the “lead director.”

The Board believes in the importance of independent oversight, which it seeks to ensure through a variety of means, including:

The Board believes that the newly separated role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, together with the significant responsibilities of the Company’s lead independent director and other independent directors described above, provides an appropriate balance between leadership and independent oversight.

Committees of the Board

The Company has an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee but does not have a nominating committee or a committee performing the functions of a nominating committee. The entire Board fulfills the function of the nominating committee.

Audit Committee

During fiscal 2013, the members of the Audit Committee were Alfred A. Piergallini (Chairman), John B. Balousek and David N. Chichester. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that David N. Chichester qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as set forth in Section 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC and he is independent as such term is defined in the NASDAQ Rules. The functions performed by the Audit Committee include:

7

The Board of Directors has adopted a written Audit Committee charter. The charter is available on the Company’s website at www.central.com. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal 2013.

Compensation Committee

During fiscal 2013, the members of the Compensation Committee were John B. Balousek (Chairman) and Alfred A. Piergallini. In addition, David N. Chichester served on the Compensation Committee during the beginning of fiscal 2013. The functions performed by the Compensation Committee include:

The Board of Directors has adopted a written Compensation Committee charter. The charter is available on the Company’s website at www.central.com. The Compensation Committee held 17 meetings during fiscal 2013.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement includes additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for considering and determining executive officer compensation.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Messrs. Balousek, Chichester and Piergallini served as members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2013. They have no relationship with the Company other than as directors and stockholders. During fiscal 2013, no executive officer of the Company served as a director, or as a member of any compensation committee, of any other for-profit entity that had an executive officer that served on the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of the Company.

8

Attendance at Meetings

During fiscal 2013, there were nine meetings of the Board of Directors. No members of the Board of Directors attended fewer than seventy-five percent of the meetings of the Board of Directors and all committees of the Board on which they served. The Company encourages, but does not require, the members of its Board of Directors to attend its annual meeting of stockholders. All members of the Board attended the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Stockholder Communications with Directors

The Board welcomes communications from the Company’s stockholders. Stockholders may send communications to the Board, or to any director in particular, c/o Central Garden & Pet Company, 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94597. Any correspondence addressed to the Board or to any director in care of the Company’s offices is forwarded by the Company to the addressee without review by management.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Company faces a number of risks, including operational, economic, financial, legal, regulatory and competitive. The Company’s management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks faced by the Company. While the Board, as a whole, has ultimate responsibility for the oversight of risk management, it administers its risk oversight role in part through the Board committee structure, with the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee responsible for monitoring and reporting on the material risks associated with their subject matter areas.

The Board’s role in the Company’s risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, economic, financial, legal, regulatory and competitive risks. The full Board (or the appropriate committee in the case of risks that are reviewed by a particular committee) receives these reports from those responsible for the relevant risk to enable it to understand the Company’s risk exposures and the steps that management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. When a committee receives the report, the Chairman of the relevant committee typically provides a summary to the full Board at the next Board meeting. This process helps the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role. The Audit Committee assists the Board in oversight and monitoring of principal risk exposures related to financial statements, legal, regulatory and other matters, as well as related mitigation efforts. The Compensation Committee assesses, at least annually, the risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies.

Compensation of Directors

Members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Company receive directors’ fees consisting of $35,000 per year and $1,500 for each Board meeting attended in person. The chairs of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee each receive additional annual retainer fees of $15,000, and the lead director receives an additional retainer fee of $25,000. Directors who attend meetings of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee receive an additional $1,500 for each meeting not held on the same day as a Board meeting.

Each non-employee director also receives $500 for participation in each telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee of less than three hours and $1,000 for participation in meetings of three hours or more. The Company pays non-employee directors $1,500 for each day spent traveling to board and committee meetings, attending subsidiary and division management meetings and conducting plant and facility visits. Mr. Pennington receives similar annual, per meeting and travel fees for his Board service.

Under the Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan, on the date of each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee director will be granted a number of (i) options to purchase shares of Class A

9

Common Stock determined by dividing $200,000 by the closing price of a share of Class A Common Stock on the date of such meeting and (ii) shares of restricted stock determined by dividing $20,000 by the closing price of a share of Class A Common Stock on the date of such meeting. Mr. Pennington will receive similar awards under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

Set forth below is a summary of the compensation paid during fiscal 2013 to the Company’s directors, except Mr. Brown and Mr. Ranelli, whose compensation is reported below under Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation of Executive Officers.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Director Nominations

Due to the limited size of the Board, the Board has determined that it is not necessary at this time to establish a separate nominating committee. As such, the entire Board fulfills the function of nominating additional directors. A majority of the members of the Board have been determined by the Board to be

10

independent under the standards established by NASDAQ. At a minimum, the Chairman of the Board, as well as at least two independent directors, must interview any qualified candidates prior to nomination. Other directors and members of management will also interview each candidate as requested by the Chairman. Once potential candidates have successfully progressed through the interview stage, the independent directors will meet in executive session to consider the screened candidates. All director nominees must be selected, or recommended for the Board’s selection, by a majority of the independent directors.

A majority of the members of the Board must be independent directors as defined in NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2). When considering potential director candidates, the Board also considers the candidate’s knowledge, experience, integrity, leadership, reputation and ability to understand the Company’s business. In addition, all director nominees must possess certain core competencies, which may include experience in consumer products, logistics, product design, merchandising, marketing, general operations, strategy, human resources, technology, media or public relations, finance or accounting, or experience as a Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer. While we do not have a formal diversity policy for Board membership, we look for potential candidates that help ensure that the Board has the benefit of a wide range of attributes.

The Board will consider any director candidate recommended by stockholders, provided that the candidate satisfies the minimum qualifications for directors as described above. Stockholders must submit recommendations to the Company’s Secretary for consideration by the Board no later than 120 days before the annual meeting of stockholders. To date, the Board has not received any recommendations for nominees to be considered at the Annual Meeting from any non-management stockholder or group of stockholders that beneficially own five percent or more of the Company’s voting stock.

When the need arises, the Company engages independent search firms and consultants to identify potential director nominees and assist the Board in identifying a diverse pool of qualified candidates and evaluating and pursuing individual candidates at the direction of the Chairman of the Board.

All of the nominees included on this year’s proxy card are directors standing for re-election.

11

PROPOSAL TWO RATIFY THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 27, 2014. If stockholders fail to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection. If the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP is approved, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may still direct the appointment of a different independent auditing firm at any time and without stockholder approval if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE SELECTION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The following table lists the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for all “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” and “All Other Fees” for the last two fiscal years.

Audit Fees

The Audit fees for the fiscal years ended on September 29, 2012 and September 28, 2013 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, issuance of consents and other assistance in connection with regulatory filings with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees

The audit-related fees for the fiscal year ended on September 29, 2012 were primarily related to the Company’s debt offering. The audit-related fees for the fiscal year ended on September 28, 2013 were related to a statutory audit and an SEC comment letter.

Audit Committee Authorization of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee has the sole authority to authorize all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm engaged to conduct the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures which are detailed as to each particular service, the Audit Committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to management. The Audit Committee pre-approved fees for all audit and non-audit related services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in fiscal years 2012 and 2013.

12

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT ON AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any of the Company’s previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate this Proxy Statement or future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in whole or in part, the following report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.

The Audit Committee of the Board consists of the directors whose signatures appear below. Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined in the NASDAQ Rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

The Audit Committee’s general function is to oversee the Company’s accounting and financial reporting and internal control processes and the audits of the Company’s financial statements, including monitoring the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Its specific responsibilities are set forth in its charter. The charter is available on the Company’s website at www.central.com.

As required by the charter, the Audit Committee reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for fiscal year ended September 28, 2013 and met with management, as well as with representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to discuss the financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communications With Audit Committees, as amended by (AICPA Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.

In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP their independence from management and the Company and received the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence.

Based on these discussions, the financial statement review and other matters it deemed relevant, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended on September 28, 2013.

13

PROPOSAL THREE ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Public companies are generally required to include in their proxy solicitations, no less frequently than once every three years, a non-binding resolution subject to stockholder vote to approve the compensation of named executive officers (an “Advisory Vote on Compensation”). As described more fully in the “Executive Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the related tables and narrative, the Compensation Committee designs the Company’s executive compensation program to reward, retain and, in the case of new hires, attract executives to support the Company’s business strategy, achieve its short and long-term goals. At the core of the Company’s executive compensation program is the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy that links competitive levels of compensation to achievements of the Company’s overall strategy and business goals, as well as predetermined objectives for equity awards. The Company believes its compensation program is strongly aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

The Company urges stockholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement and the tables and narrative for the details on the Company’s executive compensation, including the fiscal 2013 compensation of the named executive officers. Highlights of the Company’s executive compensation programs include the following:

The Compensation Committee believes the compensation program for the named executive officers has been instrumental in helping recruit seasoned executives such as the Company’s new Chief Executive Officer, retaining the Company’s senior executives and aligning their interests with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

The Compensation Committee discharges many of the Board’s responsibilities related to executive compensation and continuously strives to align the Company’s compensation policies with the Company’s performance. The Compensation Committee has, over the last three years, among other things, taken the following actions:

The Compensation Committee will continue to analyze the Company’s executive compensation policies and practices and adjust them as appropriate to reflect the Company’s performance and competitive needs.

14

Based on the above, the Board of Directors requests that stockholders indicate their support for the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and practices, by voting in favor of the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation of the Company’s executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and the other narrative compensation disclosures is hereby approved.

The opportunity to vote on Proposal Three is required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act of 1934. As an advisory vote, the vote on Proposal Three is not binding upon the Company. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering the Company’s executive compensation program, and the Board value the opinions expressed by stockholders, and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for the Company’s named executive officers.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

15

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

Effective February 11, 2013, Mr. Brown stepped down as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Ranelli was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer. The Committee’s compensation actions for the named executive officers included:

The Committee discharges many of the Board’s responsibilities related to executive compensation and continuously strives to align the Company’s compensation policies with the Company’s performance. The Committee will continue to analyze the Company’s executive compensation policies and practices and adjust them as appropriate to reflect the Company’s performance and competitive needs.

Impact of Say-On-Pay Vote on Compensation Decisions

At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in February 2011, 83% of the shares eligible to vote at the meeting voted to approve the compensation paid to our named executives, and 64% of the shares eligible to vote voted in favor of holding a say-on-pay-vote every three years. As a result, the Board determined to hold a vote every three years. Upon receiving the results of the latest say-on-pay-vote vote, the Committee considered the views of our stockholders in connection with our executive compensation program, in particular, the 83% approval vote at the February 2011 annual meeting, and determined to continue to approach compensation decisions in substantially the same way as in recent years.

16

Compensation Objectives

The objectives of the Company’s compensation program are to recruit and retain high-caliber executives, and to incentivize those executives to achieve the best possible financial results for the Company and its stockholders. The Company uses three primary tools to compensate executive officers: base salary, annual bonus and long-term equity compensation. Together they combine to provide an executive’s total compensation package. The Company views base salary as a primary indicator of the market value needed to attract and retain executives with the skills and expertise to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of their positions. Annual bonus is principally seen as a means of rewarding job performance and enhancing base salary to meet current market value, and the Company utilizes restricted stock and stock options as a means of linking executives’ long-term benefits to performance and as retention devices.

The Company’s compensation program rewards executive officers for progress against corporate operating goals and for their individual contributions. A substantial portion of each executive’s total compensation opportunity is weighted toward incentive compensation. When the Company does not achieve satisfactory financial results and/or its stock price does not appreciate, the compensation that can be realized by the Company’s executives may be substantially reduced. When the Company exceeds financial expectations and/or its stock price appreciates, the compensation that can be realized by the Company’s executives may be increased. The Committee believes that this is the most effective means of aligning executive incentives with stockholders’ interests.

Process

As described below, the Committee periodically uses surveys and reports prepared internally and by compensation consulting firms to understand the compensation levels and pay structure at peer group companies. The Company’s compensation is generally evaluated against the broad range of compensation paid by the peer group; however, the Committee also uses its judgment to determine specific pay levels necessary to attract, retain, focus and motivate executive talent. In exercising this judgment, the Committee looks beyond the market data to include individual job performance and compensation history, future potential, internal comparisons, retention risk for individual executives, and, in the case of new hires, compensation at former employers.

With respect to the compensation of John R. Ranelli, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since February 2013, the Committee did not retain an external compensation consultant as part of its process of determining his initial salary, bonus potential, actual bonus and equity compensation in fiscal 2013. Instead, the Committee determined Mr. Ranelli’s compensation by the compensation paid to the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and to the CEO of the Central Operating Companies, both of which had been reviewed and benchmarked against peer group companies by the Committee’s compensation consultant. With respect to the compensation of William E. Brown, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until February 2013, the Committee retained an external compensation consultant as part of its process of determining his salary subsequent to his stepping down as Chief Executive Officer while remaining as Chairman and an active employee of the Company. With respect to the Company’s other executive officers, the Committee receives, evaluates and considers the recommendations of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and may consult with the Company’s Human Resources managers as part of its process of determining compensation. From time to time, the Chairman and/or the Chief Executive Officer may attend portions of meetings of the Committee, although they do not vote with the Committee. Other executive officers generally have no role in making decisions regarding compensation of the Company’s executive officers.

The Committee determines base salary and target bonus as of each officer’s hire date, and it generally reconsiders both elements on an annual basis. The Committee generally determines officers’ annual bonuses and whether performance targets have been met for equity performance-based awards after the Company’s financial results for the prior fiscal year are announced. The Committee generally grants each officer stock options and/or shares of restricted stock upon his or her hire date and considers granting additional awards on an annual basis. The Committee generally grants bonuses or equity compensation to existing officers on a standard schedule.

17

Compensation Consultants and Benchmarking

The Committee has the authority to retain the services of compensation consultants and other advisors, as it deems necessary or appropriate, in connection with the administration of the Company’s compensation and employee benefit plans, policies and programs. The Committee has periodically retained the services of a compensation consulting firm to assist the Committee in formulating its recommendations regarding executive compensation. During fiscal 2013, the Committee engaged Pay Governance to help it evaluate the appropriate base salary for Mr. Brown in his role as executive chairman.

The Company did not conduct any surveys of peer company compensation for benchmarking purposes during fiscal 2013.

Allocation and Amount

The Company compensates its executives through a combination of annual cash compensation (comprised of base salary and annual bonus) and long-term equity incentive compensation (comprised of stock options and, in some cases, restricted stock grants). The Committee views base salary and the annual bonus targets as an essential part of attracting, retaining and motivating executive officers. The Committee also believes that equity incentive compensation is an essential factor in recruiting and retaining top executives and in driving performance.

The use and relative weights of base salary, annual bonus and long-term equity compensation are based on a subjective determination by the Committee of the effectiveness of each executive in all areas of management, including achievement of the Company’s strategic objectives, leadership, operating skills and other attributes. Generally, the Committee views the various elements of compensation as part of one overall package but believes that a majority of the total compensation package should be weighted toward the performance of the Company and stock price appreciation in order to align the interest of management and stockholders. In fiscal 2013, base salary, benefits and perquisites ranged from approximately 45% to 67% of each executive’s potential compensation, reflecting the importance of performance-based bonuses and stock price appreciation.

When evaluating corporate performance, the Committee generally considers financial metrics such as revenue and earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT. When evaluating individual performance, the Committee considers the individual’s overall leadership and management skills, success in attracting, retaining and developing qualified subordinates, success in achieving corporate and strategic objectives, ability to work with peers and supervisors in an effective and collegial manner, and other criteria.

As appropriate, the Committee uses tally sheets setting forth various components of compensation of the named executive officers, including dollar amounts for salary, annual bonus and perquisites and the value of unexercised stock options and restricted stock awards, to assist it in balancing the elements.

When making compensation decisions, the Committee also considers the issue of internal pay equity between the compensation of other Company executive officers and the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee also considers issues relating to the corporate tax and accounting treatment of various forms of compensation and the impact of compensation decisions on stockholder dilution.

The Committee continues to subscribe to the philosophy that the overall performance of the Company and its stock price should be the primary areas of consideration when rewarding the Company’s top executives. However, the Committee also seeks to ensure that the Company’s executive officers are paid competitively with the market so that they remain motivated to stay with the Company.

Salary

The Committee reviews the base salary of the executive officers each year. In some instances, the Committee has adjusted base salaries of individual named executive officers for retention reasons or to maintain internal pay equity and salary integrity among the senior executives. The Committee approved salary increases of

18

$20,000 for each of Messrs. LaMonte and Yuhas and Ms. Varlas in fiscal 2013. Mr. Brown’s salary was reduced in connection with his stepping down as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Ranelli’s salary was set at a level consistent with that paid to Mr. Brown as Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Halas as Chief Executive Officer of the Central Operating Companies and at a level required to recruit him to join the Company.

Annual Bonus

The Committee determines the bonus awarded to each named executive officer after the end of each fiscal year primarily by considering the financial results of the Company for the given year and the officer’s individual performance and contribution to the Company. The bonus may be paid in cash or equity. The Committee generally sets potential target bonuses for each named executive officer at the beginning of each fiscal year as a percentage of his or her base salary. The target bonus percentages are generally set at a level which the Committee believes will assure that the executive’s total compensation opportunity is attractive enough to motivate superior performance and that the executive is focused on key objectives, as well as being competitive with amounts paid for similar performance in comparable executive positions by the Company’s peer companies.

The Committee does not use a pre-determined formula to calculate any executive officer’s actual bonus compensation, or assign weights to particular financial metrics or individual performance factors, and retains the full discretion to determine annual bonuses up to and beyond the amount of such officer’s bonus potential for the year. When determining the amount of cash bonuses, the Committee generally considers various factors, including the Company’s revenue, EBIT and working capital levels, but may consider additional factors in any given year. The Committee also considers individual performance, including an executive’s overall leadership and his or her contribution to the achievement of annual and long-term financial and strategic goals, such as customer relationships, talent development, teamwork among business units, identification and pursuit of strategic initiatives, cost control efforts and innovation and new product development, among others.

Fiscal 2012 Bonuses. Beginning in early 2013, the Committee met to determine bonuses based on the Company’s performance in fiscal 2012. The following table sets forth the target bonus and actual bonus paid to the following named executive officers for fiscal 2012:

In determining whether to award bonuses to the named executive officers for fiscal 2012, the Committee considered the Company’s disappointing financial performance in fiscal 2012, as measured by EBIT and earnings per share, among other factors, as well as progress made during fiscal 2012 in implementing the Company’s transformational change initiative. The Committee also considered individual performance. The Committee considered each of these measures against the comparable prior year performance and the Company’s plan for fiscal 2012, as opposed to particular pre-determined targets or similar metrics within the Company’s industries. Because of the disappointing financial performance in fiscal 2012, the Committee did not award a bonus to Mr. Brown. Because of the disappointing financial performance in fiscal 2012 and the transition of Mr. Halas and Mr. Palantoni to consulting positions in 2013, the Committee did not award bonuses to either Mr. Halas or Mr. Palantoni. Bonuses were awarded to Mr. LaMonte and Ms. Varlas for their individual efforts during fiscal 2012, including their work in implementing the Company’s transformational change initiative.

19

Fiscal 2013 Bonuses. With the exception of bonus decisions for Messrs. Brown, Reed and Yuhas, the Committee has not yet determined the amount of bonuses, if any, to be paid to the remaining named executive officers with respect to fiscal 2013. The following table sets forth the target bonus percentages for each of the named executive officers with respect to fiscal 2013:

In determining whether to award bonuses to Messrs. Reed and Yuhas for fiscal 2013, the Committee considered the Company’s financial performance in fiscal 2013, their individual performance, and progress made during fiscal 2013 in implementing the Company’s strategic initiatives. Bonuses were awarded to Messrs. Reed and Yuhas for their individual efforts during fiscal 2013, including Mr. Reed’s efforts in improving the performance of the Pet segment and Mr. Yuhas’ efforts in managing the Company’s legal and regulatory affairs. The fiscal 2013 bonuses determined to date were paid in a combination of cash and stock. In light of the fiscal 2013 results, Mr. Brown declined to be considered for a bonus in fiscal 2013, and the Committee concurred.

The Company will report the remaining fiscal 2013 bonus determinations, if any, in a Form 8-K once decisions are made in early 2014.

The Company does not have a policy regarding the recovery or adjustment of awards based on Company performance if a material financial measure considered by the Committee in any particular year is subsequently restated.

Stock Options

The Committee determines the size of executive officers’ initial hire option grants with primary consideration towards making the offer of employment market competitive while consistent with awards granted to other executives. The size of annual option grants to officers is determined after giving consideration to the officer’s performance over the fiscal year, awards previously granted to the officer, such officer’s accumulated vested and unvested awards, the current value and potential value over time using stock appreciation assumptions for vested and unvested awards, the vesting schedule of the officer’s outstanding awards, comparison of individual awards among executives and in relation to other compensation elements, stockholder dilution and total compensation expense.

From fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2011, the Committee granted stock options that included performance targets and time-based vesting. In fiscal 2012, the Committee determined that moving to only time-based options would be more consistent with industry practice, more understandable by employees and less complicated to administer. As a result, the Committee granted time-based stock options to the executive officers during fiscal 2013 with an exercise price equal to the closing share price on the date of the grant, except for certain premium priced options awarded to Mr. Ranelli. The options granted in fiscal 2013 vest in four annual installments commencing one year from the date of grant.

20

In February 2013, the Committee granted Mr. Ranelli a combination of market priced and premium priced stock options to purchase 625,022 shares of Class A stock. The grant included options to purchase 209,205 shares at $12.50 per share and 209,205 shares at $15.00 per share, representing exercise prices 40% to 68% higher than the grant date closing prices to further align his interest with the Company’s stockholders and reward him only if the Company’s stock price increases significantly.

The performance-based stock options granted from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2011 vest in five equal annual installments commencing one year from the date of grant. Twenty percent of each award vests subject to the satisfaction of certain annual or cumulative performance targets for each of the five fiscal years starting with the year of grants. The performance targets are (i) earnings before interest and taxes adjusted for acquisitions and divestitures, non-recurring income or expense and other adjustments determined by the Committee (the “Adjusted EBIT”) and (ii) net controllable assets, which is intended to award employees for reductions in average working capital (the “Net Controllable Assets”).

If at the end of a fiscal year, any of the following was achieved, 20% of the shares relating to the Company target shall vest and become exercisable on the anniversary of the grant date following such fiscal year: (i) Adjusted EBIT is greater than the target floor and Net Controllable Assets is less than the target ceiling; or (ii) Adjusted EBIT is greater than the target floor by an amount which exceeds twenty percent (20%) of the amount by which Net Controllable Assets are above the target ceiling; or (iii) Adjusted EBIT is below the target floor by an amount that is less than twenty percent (20%) of the amount by which Net Controllable Assets are below the target ceiling. If the targets in a particular year are not met, the employee can still vest in the options in subsequent years if the Company’s cumulative performance exceeds the cumulative targets. The Committee has the sole and absolute discretion to determine whether and the extent to which performance goals have been achieved.

Because each option award includes performance targets for five future years, it is necessary for the Committee to review the actual EBIT and Net Controllable Assets for each completed fiscal year to exclude positive and negative items that were unanticipated when the targets were established and for items that are not reflective of on-going business operations. Some of these adjustments may be one-time events and others may impact the performance targets for the remaining performance periods. The adjustments apply to all outstanding performance options, including those held by the named executive officers.

Set forth below are the annual and cumulative performance targets for fiscal 2013 with respect to the options granted in fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011 (in millions of dollars).

Based on the Company’s fiscal 2013 financial results, the Committee determined that none of the fiscal 2013 performance targets were satisfied.

Based on the percentage of the Company performance targets that have been satisfied to date, the Company currently estimates that the performance-based component of the options granted in fiscal 2010 and 2011 are unlikely to be satisfied. Executives must generally be employed by the Company at the time of vesting to exercise the options.

21

The Company does not have a program or practice of timing option grants in connection with the release of material non-public information.

Restricted Stock

The Company has historically utilized stock options as the principal means of providing its executive officers with long-term equity incentive compensation. However, the Company has also granted restricted stock to executive officers upon the commencement of employment. Generally, restricted stock vests, and the restrictions on transfer lapse, in accordance with a schedule determined by the Committee. The Committee has the authority to accelerate the time at which restrictions lapse, and/or remove restrictions, on previously granted restricted stock. In fiscal 2013, the Committee granted 50,000 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Ranelli in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. The shares of restricted stock granted to Mr. Ranelli vest one-third per year at end of years three, four and five from the date of grant.

Stock Ownership Requirements

The Company does not have any stock ownership requirements or any policy limiting an executive’s ability to hedge the risks of stock ownership.

Post-Employment Arrangements

Under the terms of the Company’s employment agreements and non-compete and post-employment consulting agreements, the named executive officers, other than Mr. Brown, are entitled to payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events, including termination of employment. The specific terms of these arrangements, as well as an estimate of the compensation that would have been payable had they been triggered as of fiscal year-end, are described below in detail in the section titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination” on page 31. The Company’s equity-based compensation plans and employment agreements do not provide for special payments to the named executive officers upon a change-in-control of the Company.

The terms of these arrangements were set through the course of arms-length negotiations with each of the named executive officers. As part of these negotiations, the Committee analyzed the terms of the same or similar arrangements for comparable executives employed by some companies in our peer group. This approach was used in setting the amounts payable and the triggering events under the arrangements. These provisions were intended to provide the individuals with a fixed amount of compensation that would offset the potential risk of leaving their prior employer or foregoing other opportunities to join or remain with the Company. The Committee considers the aggregate potential obligations of the Company in the context of the desirability of hiring the individual and the expected compensation upon joining the Company.

The non-compete and post-termination consulting agreements are intended to protect, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the Company’s confidential information, and payments thereunder are conditioned upon the executive not going to work for one of our principal competitors within a specified period of time following separation from the Company.

Benefits and Perquisites

The Company provides a 401(k) retirement plan and partial matching contributions but does not provide supplemental employee retirement plans or pensions. The Company also provides its executives with benefits such as medical, dental, life and disability insurance and other benefits that are generally available to full time employees and, in some instances, a monthly housing relocation allowance and tax gross-up payments on such allowances. The Company pays for a leased automobile or car allowance for the named executive officers, except for Mr. Brown.

22

Accounting and Tax Treatment

In determining executive compensation, the Committee considers, among other factors, the possible tax consequences to the Company and to the executives. However, the Committee believes that it is important to retain flexibility in designing compensation programs that meet the Company’s stated objectives. For this reason, the Committee will not necessarily limit compensation to those levels or types of compensation that will be tax deductible. The Committee does of course consider alternative forms of compensation, consistent with the Company’s compensation goals, that preserve deductibility.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally does not allow a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to the Chief Executive Officer or any of the four other most highly compensated executive officers unless the compensation is paid based solely on the attainment of one or more pre-established objective performance goals and certain other requirements are met. To date, the Company’s non-equity compensation plans have generally not been designed to permit the Company to grant awards that qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m).

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed that analysis with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2013. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Compensation Committee:

December 27, 2013

JOHN B. BALOUSEK, Chairman

ALFRED A. PIERGALLINI

23

Compensation of Executive Officers

Set forth below is the compensation paid to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and certain other executive officers during our three fiscal years ended on September 28, 2013.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

24

Employment Agreement – John R. Ranelli

On January 9, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John R. Ranelli. This employment agreement provides that Mr. Ranelli will receive an annual salary of $673,000. He is also eligible for an annual bonus targeted at 75% of his base compensation, subject to his and the Company’s performance. During the initial year of his employment, at a minimum, he will be entitled to a prorated portion of the target bonus amount measured by the portion of the fiscal year during which he is employed by the Company so long as he remains employed by the Company through that time. The Company may terminate Mr. Ranelli’s agreement at any time without cause upon 24 months’ written notice. If the Company terminates Mr. Ranelli without cause, he will continue to receive his base salary and health insurance benefits for nine months, subject to the execution of a general release of claims. At its option, the Company may pay Mr. Ranelli 24 months additional salary and benefits in lieu of giving 24 months notice.

Employment Agreement – Lori A. Varlas

On November 5, 2010, the Company entered into an Employment Letter Agreement with Lori A. Varlas. This employment agreement provides that Ms. Varlas will receive an annual minimum salary of $380,000, which has been increased to $420,000. She is also eligible for an annual bonus, targeted at 50% of base compensation, subject to her and the Company’s performance. The agreement has an indeterminate term, unless terminated for her dismissal with cause, death or disability. If the Company terminates Ms. Varlas without cause, she will continue to receive her base salary for nine months, subject to Ms. Varlas’ execution of a general release of claims.

Employment Agreement – Steven R. LaMonte

On April 2, 2012, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Steven R. LaMonte. This employment agreement provides that Mr. LaMonte will receive an annual minimum salary of $425,000, which has been increased to $445,000. He is also eligible for an annual bonus, targeted at 50% of base compensation, subject to his and the Company’s performance. The agreement has an indeterminate term, unless terminated for his dismissal with cause, death or disability. The Company may terminate Mr. LaMonte’s employment at any time without cause upon 30 days written notice. If the Company terminates Mr. LaMonte without cause, he will continue to receive his base salary and health insurance benefits for nine months and COBRA health insurance benefits for an additional nine months, subject to Mr. LaMonte’s execution of a general release of claims. At its option, the Company may pay Mr. LaMonte 30 days additional salary and benefits in lieu of giving 30 days notice.

25

Employment Agreement – George Yuhas

On March 1, 2011, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with George A. Yuhas. This employment agreement provides that Mr. Yuhas will receive an annual minimum salary of $380,000, which has been increased to $410,000. He is also eligible for an annual bonus, targeted at 50% of base compensation, subject to his and the Company’s performance. The agreement has an indeterminate term, unless terminated for his dismissal with cause, death or disability. The Company may terminate Mr. Yuhas’ agreement at any time without cause upon 24 months’ written notice. If the Company terminates Mr. Yuhas without cause, he will continue to receive his base salary and health insurance benefits for nine months, subject to the execution of a general release of claims. At its option, the Company may pay Mr. Yuhas 24 months additional salary and benefits in lieu of giving 24 months notice.

26

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the named executive officers during fiscal 2013, which ended on September 28, 2013. The option awards identified in the table below are also reported in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table.

27

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers at the end of fiscal 2013, which ended on September 28, 2013.