SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Notes:

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600

Walnut Creek, California 94597

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Monday, February 12, 2007, 10:30 A.M.

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Central Garden & Pet Company will be held at the LAFAYETTE PARK HOTEL, 3287 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Lafayette, California, on Monday, February 12, 2007, at 10:30 A.M. for the following purposes:

Only stockholders of record on the books of the Company as of 5:00 P.M., December 15, 2006, will be entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournment thereof. A complete list of the Company’s stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for ten days prior to the meeting during normal business hours at the Company’s principal executive offices at 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California.

Dated:  December 29, 2006

By Order of the Board of Directors

Stuart W. Booth, Secretary

STOCKHOLDERS ARE REQUESTED TO MARK, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE.

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600

Walnut Creek, California 94597

PROXY STATEMENT

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Central Garden & Pet Company (the “Company”) to be used at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on February 12, 2007 (the “Annual Meeting”), for the purposes set forth in the foregoing notice. This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy were first sent to stockholders on or about January 4, 2006.

If the enclosed form of proxy is properly signed and returned, the shares represented thereby will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions specified thereon. If the proxy does not specify how the shares represented thereby are to be voted, the proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors. Any stockholder signing a proxy in the form accompanying this proxy statement has the power to revoke it prior to or at the Annual Meeting. A proxy may be revoked by a writing delivered to the Secretary of the Company stating that the proxy is revoked, by a subsequent proxy signed by the person who signed the earlier proxy, or by attendance at the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

VOTING SECURITIES

Only stockholders of record on the books of the Company as of 5:00 P.M., December 15, 2006, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

As of the close of business on December 15, 2006, there were outstanding 22,163,158 shares of Common Stock of the Company, entitled to one vote per share, and 1,652,262 shares of Class B Stock of the Company, entitled to the lesser of ten votes per share or 49% of the total votes cast. Holders of Common Stock and Class B Stock will vote together on all matters presented to the stockholders for their vote or approval at the meeting, including the election of directors.

The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the stock of the Company, present in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by the election inspector appointed for the meeting and will determine whether or not a quorum is present. The election inspector will treat abstentions and broker non-votes as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but as unvoted for purposes of determining the approval of any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote.

With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast “For” or “Withhold Authority” for each nominee; votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect. The directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. As a result, if you withhold your authority to vote for any nominee, your vote will not count for or against the nominee, nor will a broker “non-vote” affect the outcome of the election.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The persons named below are nominees for director to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors shall have been elected. The nominees are all members of the present Board of Directors. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, shares represented by proxy will be voted for the election of all such nominees to the Board of Directors. If any nominee is unable or unwilling to be a candidate for the office of director at the date of the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, the proxies will vote for such substitute nominee as shall be designated by the proxies. Management has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. Set forth below is certain information concerning the nominees which is based on data furnished by them.

2

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the director nominees listed above.

3

FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Board Independence

Upon consideration of the criteria and requirements regarding director independence set forth in NASDAQ Rules 4200 and 4350, the Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Balousek, Mr. Chichester, Mr. Piergallini and Mr. Westphal meet the standards of independence established by the NASDAQ.

Committees of the Board

During fiscal 2006, the Board of Directors held 12 meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on a number of occasions. The Company has an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee but does not have a nominating committee or a committee performing the functions of a nominating committee.

The members of the Audit Committee are Bruce A. Westphal (Chairman), John B. Balousek and David N. Chichester. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that David N. Chichester qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as set forth in Section 401(h) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and he is independent as such term is defined in the NASDAQ Rules. Among the functions performed by the Audit Committee are to make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the engagement or discharge of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to review with the independent registered public accounting firm the plan and results of the auditing engagement, to review the Company’s system of internal financial and accounting controls, to review the financial statements of the Company, to discuss the Company’s accounting policies, and to make inquiries into matters within the scope of its functions. The Board of Directors has adopted a written Audit Committee Charter. The Audit Committee held 12 meetings during fiscal 2006.

The members of the Compensation Committee are John B. Balousek (Chairman), Bruce A. Westphal and Alfred A. Piergallini. Among the functions performed by the Compensation Committee are to review and make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the compensation of the key management employees of the Company and to administer the Company’s equity incentive plan. The Compensation Committee held nine meetings during fiscal 2006.

Attendance at Meetings

During fiscal 2006, there were no members of the Board of Directors who attended fewer than seventy-five percent of the meetings of the Board of Directors and all committees of the Board on which they served.

Compensation of Directors

In fiscal 2006, members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Company were paid directors’ fees consisting of $25,000 per year and $1,200 for each Board meeting attended. The chairs of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee each received annual retainer fees of $12,000. Directors who attended meetings of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee received an additional $1,200 for each meeting not held on the same day as a Board meeting.

Each director receives $500 for participation in each telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee or the Compensation Committee of less than three hours and $1,000 for participation in meetings of three hours or more. The Company pays non-employee directors $1,000 for each day spent attending subsidiary and division management meetings and conducting plant and facility visits.

Under the Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan, Messrs. Balousek, Chichester, Westphal and Piergallini were each granted on the date of the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders options to purchase

4

2,896 shares of Common Stock (determined by dividing $140,000 by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of the 2006 Annual Meeting) and a restricted stock grant for 311 shares with a market value of $15,000.

Set forth below is a summary of the compensation paid during fiscal 2006 to those of the Company’s directors who are not also executive officers whose compensation is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 7.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Director Nominations

Due to the limited size of the Board, the Board has determined that it is not appropriate at this time to establish a separate nominating committee. As such, the Board as a whole fulfills the function of nominating additional directors. A majority of the members of the Board have been determined by the Board to be independent under the standards established by NASDAQ. At a minimum, the Chairman of the Board, as well as at least two independent directors, must interview any qualified candidates prior to nomination. Other directors and members of management will also interview each candidate as requested by the Chairman. Once potential candidates have successfully progressed through the interview stage, the independent directors will meet in executive session to consider the screened candidates. All director nominees must be selected, or recommended for the Board’s selection, by a majority of the independent directors.

A majority of the members of the Board must be independent directors as defined in NASDAQ Rule 4200(a)(15). When considering potential director candidates, the Board also considers the candidate’s knowledge, experience, integrity, leadership, reputation and ability to understand the Company’s business. In addition, all director nominees must possess certain core competencies, some of which may include experience in consumer products, logistics, product design, merchandising, marketing, general operations, strategy, human resources, technology, media or public relations, finance or accounting, or experience as a Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer.

The Board will consider any director candidate recommended by security holders, provided that the candidate satisfies the minimum qualifications for directors as established from time to time by the Board. To be considered, stockholders must submit recommendations to the Company’s secretary for consideration by the Board no later than 120 days before the annual meeting of stockholders. To date, the Board has not received any recommended nominees for consideration at the Annual Meeting from any non-management stockholder or group of stockholders that beneficially owns five percent or more of the Company’s voting stock.

5

When the need arises, the Company has engaged and intends to continue to engage independent search firms and consultants to identify potential director nominees and assist the Board in identifying a diverse pool of qualified candidates and in evaluating and pursuing individual candidates at the direction of the Chairman of the Board.

All of the nominees included on this year’s proxy card are directors standing for re-election.

Stockholder Communications with Directors

The Board welcomes communications from the Company’s stockholders. Stockholders may send communications to the Board, or to any director in particular, c/o Central Garden & Pet Company, 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94597. Any correspondence addressed to the Board or to any director care of the Company’s offices is forwarded by the Company to the addressee without review by management.

The Company encourages, but does not require, the members of its Board of Directors to attend its annual meetings of stockholders. All members of the Board attended the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

6

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation of Executive Officers

Set forth below is the compensation paid during fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006 to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the five other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company who were executive officers on September 30, 2006.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

7

8

The following table sets forth certain information regarding stock options granted during fiscal 2006 to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. None of such persons received awards of stock appreciation rights during fiscal 2006.

OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to stock options exercised during fiscal 2006 and stock options held by each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table as of September 30, 2006. The closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the last trading day of the fiscal year was $48.26 per share.

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUE

9

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table gives information about the Company’s Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under its existing equity compensation plans as of September 30, 2006.

Employment Arrangements

Pursuant to a Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Agreement dated effective as of June 19, 2002 between Mr. Novotny and the Company, Mr. Novotny had the right (subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee) to defer receipt of a certain portion of his compensation, with such deferred compensation to be credited with investment return or loss in accordance with the performance of a measuring investment fund or funds. On December 14, 2005, the Board of Directors approved the amendment and restatement of this agreement (as so amended and restated, the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) and its expansion to additional employees of the Company. Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan, eligible employees of the Company including Mr. Novotny may elect to defer receipt of a percentage of their base salary and/or incentive bonuses until a future date or dates. Compensation deferred pursuant to this Plan will be credited with investment return or loss in accordance with the performance of a measuring investment fund or funds.

The Company and Mr. Novotny entered into a Post Employment Consulting Agreement on November 7, 2005. This agreement provides that, in the event Mr. Novotny’s employment with the Company terminates, for a period of twenty-four (24) months thereafter Mr. Novotny will be available approximately 10 hours per month to provide strategic advice and counsel to the Company for a base fee of $5,000 per month, subject to adjustment. This agreement contains confidentiality and non-competition provisions.

The Company and Mr. Booth entered into a Post Employment Consulting Agreement on December 9, 2004. This agreement provides that, in the event Mr. Booth’s employment with the Company terminates, for a period of twenty-four (24) months thereafter Mr. Booth will be available approximately 10 hours per month to provide strategic advice and counsel to the Company for a base fee of $2,500 per month, subject to adjustment. This agreement contains confidentiality and non-competition provisions.

On April 10, 2006, the Company and Brooks M. Pennington III entered into a Modification and Extension of the Employment and Non-Compete Agreement dated February 27, 1998, as amended June 2, 2003. This modified and extended agreement provides that effective October 1, 2006, Mr. Pennington would resign as President and CEO of Pennington Seed, Inc. and would thereafter serve as Director of Special Projects for the Company until February 28, 2011. In this position, Mr. Pennington will be expected to work a maximum of 650 hours per year for a base salary of $100,000 annually.

10

On July 9, 2004, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with James V. Heim. This employment agreement provides that Mr. Heim will serve as President of the Company’s Pet Products division at an annual minimum salary of $375,000. He is also eligible for an annual bonus, targeted at 50% of base compensation with a maximum payout of 100%, subject to his and the Company’s performance. The agreement terminates in August 2007, unless terminated earlier for his dismissal with cause, death or disability. If the Company terminates Mr. Heim without cause, he will continue to receive the compensation and benefits provided thereunder for the remaining term of the agreement.

On September 30, 2005, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Bradley P. Johnson. This employment agreement, which has a term of five years, provides that Mr. Johnson will serve as President of the Company’s Garden Group at an annual salary of $450,000. He is also eligible for an annual bonus, targeted at 50% of base compensation with a maximum payout of 100%, subject to his and the Company’s performance. For fiscal 2006, Mr. Johnson’s bonus is guaranteed at the 50% level. Mr. Johnson is also entitled to a transition fee of $250,000 payable upon his start of employment and $250,000 payable upon the first anniversary of his employment. This transition fee is subject to repayment if Mr. Johnson does not remain employed by the Company for at least two years. The Company will also reimburse Mr. Johnson for certain relocation expenses and for a portion of the difference in the interest costs associated with a new home in the Walnut Creek, California area and his previous home. If the Company terminates Mr. Johnson other than for cause, he will continue to receive compensation and benefits for one year. If Mr. Johnson terminates his employment for Material Breach (as defined in the agreement), he will continue to receive compensation and benefits for one year. The agreement terminates in November 2010, unless terminated earlier for his dismissal with cause, death or disability.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Messrs. Westphal, Balousek and Piergallini served as members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2006. They have no relationship with the Company other than as directors and stockholders. During fiscal 2006, no executive officer of the Company served as a director, or as a member of any compensation committee, of any other for-profit entity that had an executive officer that served on the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of the Company.

Transactions with the Company

Brooks M. Pennington III, a director of the Company standing for re-election, is a minority shareholder and a director of Bio Plus, Inc., a company that produces granular peanut hulls. During the twelve months ended September 30, 2006, Bio Plus, Inc.’s total revenues were approximately $5.3 million, of which approximately $1.5 million were derived from sales to subsidiaries of the Company. As of September 30, 2006, the Company owed Bio Plus, Inc. approximately $52,000 for such purchases.

11

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

ON AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors consists of the directors whose signatures appear below. Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined in the NASDAQ Rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

The Audit Committee’s general function is to oversee the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the Company’s financial statements, including monitoring the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Its specific responsibilities are set forth in its charter, a copy of which was attached as Appendix A to the proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

As required by the charter, the Audit Committee reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for fiscal 2006 and met with management, as well as with representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to discuss the financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards 61, Communication with Audit Committees.

In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP their independence from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees.

Based on these discussions, the financial statement review and other matters it deemed relevant, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.

12

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

To the Board of Directors:

As members of the Compensation Committee, it is our duty to determine the compensation for officers and directors and to administer the Company’s equity incentive plans. In addition, we evaluate the performance of management and related matters.

Overview

The Company uses three primary tools to compensate executives. They are base salary, cash bonus and equity compensation. Together they combine to provide an executive’s total compensation package. The Company does not provide benefits or perquisites of significant value to its executives. The Company views base salary as a primary indicator of the market value needed to attract and retain an executive with the skill and expertise to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of the position. Cash bonus is principally seen as a means of rewarding superior job performance and enhancing base salary to the extent necessary to meet current market value, and the Company utilizes restricted stock and stock options as a means of linking executives’ long-term benefits to the rate of return received by stockholders. The objectives of the Company’s compensation program are to recruit and retain high-caliber executives, and to incentivize those executives to achieve the best possible long-term financial results for the Company and its stockholders.

Process

As described below, the Compensation Committee uses surveys and reports prepared by compensation consulting firms to assist us in understanding the compensation levels and pay structure at peer group companies. The Company’s compensation is generally targeted within the broad range of compensation paid by the peer group, however, we use our judgment to determine specific pay levels necessary to attract and retain executive talent. In exercising this judgment, we look beyond the market data and place significant weight on individual job performance and compensation history, future potential, internal comparisons, retention risk for individual executives, and, in the case of new hires, compensation at former employers.

With respect to the compensation of Glenn W. Novotny, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, we receive and consider the recommendation of William E. Brown, the Company’s Chairman, as part of our process of determining Mr. Novotny’s salary, bonus potential, actual bonus and equity compensation. Mr. Novotny does not make recommendations for his own compensation. In addition, Mr. Brown is invited to attend portions of many of the meetings of the Compensation Committee, although he does not vote with the Compensation Committee. With respect to the Company’s other executive officers, we receive and consider the recommendations of Mr. Brown and Mr. Novotny and consult with the Company’s Vice President of Human Resources as part of our process of determining compensation. Other than as described herein, other executive officers have no role in making decisions regarding compensation of our executive officers.

The Compensation Committee determines base salary and bonus potential as of each officer’s hire date, and we reconsider both elements on or about each anniversary of that hire date. We generally determine officers’ annual cash bonus in December or January of the succeeding fiscal year. We generally grant each officer a certain number of stock options upon his or her hire date and grant additional awards on an annual basis after the Company’s financial results for that fiscal year are announced. We generally do not grant, and have not in the past fiscal year granted, bonuses or equity compensation to officers on a “one-off” basis or outside of the standard schedule.

Compensation Consultants and Benchmarking

During 2006, the Company retained the services of Towers Perrin, a compensation consulting firm, to assist Mr. Brown and Mr. Novotny in formulating their recommendations regarding executive compensation. The

13

Compensation Committee also received the report of that compensation consultant and used it to assist us in determining the market value compensation for the executive officers. Survey data, coupled with performance-based peer group evaluations, were used to help determine competitive short and long-term awards for executives.

Allocation and Amount

As mentioned above, the Company compensates its executives through a combination of annual cash compensation (comprised of base salary and annual cash bonus) and long-term incentive compensation (comprised of stock options and, in some cases, restricted stock grants). The Company views base salary and the annual bonus target as an essential part of attracting and retaining executive officers and thus we set both at a level that we believe are necessary to attract and retain top executives. However, the Company believes, based on market data and actual experience, that equity incentive compensation is an essential factor in recruiting top executives and in driving superior performance.

The use and relative weights of base salary, cash bonus and equity compensation is based on a subjective determination by the Compensation Committee of the effectiveness of each in supporting the Company’s business and talent strategies, as well as the prevalence, weight and value of these elements for executives at other companies. Generally, the Compensation Committee views the various elements of compensation as part of one overall package, and uses tally sheets setting forth all components of compensation, including dollar amounts for salary, bonus and perquisites and the value of unexercised stock options and restricted stock awards, to assist us in balancing the elements.

When making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee considers the issue of internal pay equity between the compensation of other Company officers compared to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. We also consider issues relating to the tax and accounting treatment of various forms of compensation and, with respect to equity compensation, we give serious consideration to the amount of dilution caused by grants of equity compensation. Our Company is focused on limiting dilution to the extent practicable, and we make our decisions with that goal in mind.

Salary and Cash Bonus

The Compensation Committee determines the actual amount of cash bonus awarded to each officer primarily by considering the financial results of the Company for the given year and such officer’s individual performance and contribution to the Company. We do not use a pre-determined formula to calculate any officer’s bonus compensation and have full discretion to determine annual bonuses.

The Company does not have a policy regarding the recovery or adjustment of awards based on Company performance if the relevant financial measures are restated. In such event, the Compensation Committee would consider whether it is appropriate to seek recovery of previously paid awards or adjust future awards appropriately.

Stock Options

The Compensation Committee determines the size of executive officers’ initial hire option grants with primary consideration towards making the offer of employment market competitive. The size of annual option grants to officers is determined after giving consideration to market factors, the officer’s performance over the fiscal year, awards previously granted to the officer, such officer’s accumulated vested and unvested awards, the current value and potential value over time using stock appreciation assumptions for vested and unvested awards, the vesting schedule of the officer’s outstanding awards, comparison of individual awards between executives and in relation to other compensation elements, stockholder dilution, and total accounting expense.

14

Stock options granted during fiscal year 2006 had an exercise price equal to fair market value on the date of the grant. Stock options granted to executive officers typically vest in tranches beginning two or more years after the date of grant, with the specific vesting terms determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Executives must be employed by the Company at the time of vesting to exercise the options.

The Company does not have a program or practice of timing option grants in connection with the release of material non-public information except to the extent that it typically makes its annual option grants within a reasonable amount of time after the release of the Company’s fiscal year earnings announcement.

Restricted Stock

The Company has historically utilized stock options as the principal means of providing its executive officers with equity incentive compensation. However, in the past several years the Company has made grants of restricted stock to several executive officers in connection with arrangements providing for a post-termination consulting relationship with the Company and their entry into significant confidentiality and non-competition agreements. Generally, restricted stock vests, and the restrictions on transfer lapse, in accordance with a schedule determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the authority to accelerate the time at which any restrictions lapse, and/or remove any restrictions, on previously granted restricted stock.

The Compensation Committee is currently giving serious consideration to increasing the overall use of restricted stock (and decreasing the use of stock options) as a means of providing equity compensation to executive officers. The Compensation Committee’s decision in this regard will depend upon a number of factors, including the practices of other companies with which the Company competes for talent.

Compensation of Chief Executive Officer

During fiscal 2006, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Glenn W. Novotny, received a base salary of $700,000. Based on the Compensation Committee’s knowledge of market wages for chief executive officers of comparable public companies, as of December 14, 2006, we increased Mr. Novotny’s annual base salary to $735,000. In January 2006 and based on the Company’s performance in fiscal 2005, we paid a bonus of $500,000 in respect of fiscal 2005 to Mr. Novotny. Mr. Novotny had a target bonus of 75% of his salary with respect to fiscal 2005, thus his actual bonus represented 101% of his bonus potential. We determined to grant this bonus after giving consideration to Mr. Novotny’s individual performance and specific elements of the Company’s financial performance in fiscal 2005, including its increase in earnings per share, return on equity, return on investments and return on net assets. In addition, Mr. Novotny received a grant of 40,000 shares of restricted stock in November 2005 in connection with his entry into agreements with the Company containing confidentiality and noncompetition provisions. For fiscal 2006, Mr. Novotny had a target bonus of 75% of his salary, however, the Compensation Committee has not yet determined the amount of Mr. Novotny’s actual bonus with respect to fiscal 2006.

Stock Ownership Requirements

The Company does not have any stock ownership requirements, guidelines or expectations or any policies regarding hedging the risk of stock ownership.

Post-Employment Arrangements

Mr. Novotny and Mr. Booth are each party to a Post-Employment Consulting Agreement pursuant to which each has committed to make himself available to the Company for consulting services for 10 hours per month for two years after termination of employment with the Company. Mr. Novotny will receive $5,000 per month for such two year period while Mr. Booth will receive $2,500 per month for such consulting services. These agreements contain confidentiality and non-competition provisions.

15

Pursuant to Mr. Heim’s employment agreement, if Mr. Heim is terminated without cause he will be entitled to continue to receive the compensation and benefits provided for in his employment agreement through the end of its term. Mr. Heim’s employment agreement expires on August 20, 2007.

Pursuant to Mr. Johnson’s employment agreement, if the Company terminates Mr. Johnson without cause, or if Mr. Johnson terminates his employment because of a material breach by the Company, Mr. Johnson will continue to receive the compensation and benefits provided for in his employment agreement for one year. Mr. Johnson’s employment agreement expires on November 7, 2010.

Benefits and Perquisites

In addition to qualified retirement plans and nonqualified deferred compensation and supplemental retirement plans available to employees generally, the Company provides its executives with benefits such as medical, dental, life and disability insurance and other benefits that are generally available to full time employees. The Company pays for leased automobiles for Mr. Novotny and Mr. Booth, provides Mr. Heim and Mr. Johnson with automobile allowances, and allows Mr. Brown the use of a Company automobile. The Company also pays for a club membership for Mr. Novotny.

Accounting and Tax Treatment

In determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee considers, among other factors, the possible tax consequences to the Company and to the executives. However, we believe that it is important to retain maximum flexibility in designing compensation programs that meet the Company’s stated objectives. For this reason, we will not necessarily limit compensation to those levels or types of compensation that will be tax deductible. We will of course consider alternative forms of compensation, consistent with the Company’s compensation goals, that preserve deductibility.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally does not allow a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to the Chief Executive Officer or any of the four other most highly compensated executive officers unless the compensation is paid based solely on the attainment of one or more pre-established objective performance goals and certain other requirements are met. To date, the Company’s compensation plans have generally not been designed to permit us to grant awards that qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m).

We continue to subscribe to the philosophy that the Company’s overall performance and its return to stockholders will be the primary areas of consideration when rewarding the Company’s top executives. It is our goal to ensure that our executives are paid competitively with the market and are rewarded for performance that benefits the stockholders.

16

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph compares the percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total stockholder return on its Common Stock for the period from September 29, 2001 to September 30, 2006 with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite (U.S.) Index and the Dow Jones Non-Durable Household Products Index, a peer group index consisting of approximately 30 manufacturers and distributors of household products.

The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data and are not indicative of, or intended to forecast, the possible future performance of the Company’s Common Stock.

17

OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table indicates, as to each director, each named executive officer and each holder known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of the Company’s voting stock, the number of shares and percentage of the Company’s stock beneficially owned as of December 1, 2006.

18

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires the Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for those persons, the Company believes that, during the period from September 25, 2005 to September 30, 2006 all filing requirements applicable to its executive officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with, except for late filings made by William E. Brown, who filed a Form 4 on December 19, 2005 to report an option grant made on December 14, 2005, Glenn W. Novotny, who filed a Form 4 on April 19, 2006 to report the exercise of options on April 13, 2006 and the sale of the underlying Common Stock on April 17, 2006, and Bruce A. Westphal, who filed a Form 4 on August 10, 2006 to report an option exercise and same-day sale of Common Stock on August 7, 2006 and who reported on a Form 5 several purchases and sales of Common Stock mistakenly made by his financial planner.

19

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Deloitte & Touche LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and has been selected to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The following table lists the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for all “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” and “All Other Fees” for the last two fiscal years.

Audit Fees

The audit fees for the fiscal years ended September 24, 2005 and September 30, 2006, respectively, were for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, statutory and subsidiary audits, consents, income tax provision procedures, and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees

The audit-related fees as of the fiscal years ended September 24, 2005 and September 30, 2006 were primarily related to consultation and assistance with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, potential acquisitions, registration statements and employee benefit plan audits.

Tax Fees

Tax fees as of the fiscal years ended September 24, 2005 and September 30, 2006 were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of tax returns and claims for refund, tax planning and tax advice, including assistance with and representation in tax audits and appeals, advice related to mergers and acquisitions, tax services for employee benefit plans, and requests for rulings or technical advice from tax authorities.

All Other Fees

All other fees for the years ended September 24, 2005 and September 30, 2006 were primarily for services associated with various legal matters.

Audit Committee Authorization of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee has the sole authority to authorize all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm engaged to conduct the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures which are detailed as to each particular service, the Audit Committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities under the Exchange Act to management. The Audit Committee pre-approved fees for all non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in fiscal 2006.

20

CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of its directors, officers and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer, controller and certain other senior financial personnel. The Code of Ethics, as amended, was filed as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 24, 2005.

OTHER MATTERS

The accompanying proxy card grants the proxy holders discretionary authority, to the extent authorized by Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act, to vote on any matter raised at the Annual Meeting. As of the date of this proxy statement, there are no other matters which management intends to present or has reason to believe others will present at the meeting. If other matters properly come before the meeting, those who act as proxies will vote in accordance with their judgment.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

If any stockholder intends to present a proposal for action at the Company’s annual meeting in 2008 and wishes to have such proposal set forth in management’s proxy statement, such stockholder must forward the proposal to the Company so that it is received on or before August 31, 2007. Proposals should be addressed to the Company at 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, CA 94597, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

If a stockholder intends to submit a proposal at the Company’s annual meeting in 2008, which proposal is not intended to be included in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting, the stockholder should give appropriate notice no later than November 20, 2007. If such a stockholder fails to submit the proposal by such date, the Company will not be required to provide any information about the nature of the proposal in its proxy statement and the proxy holders will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority if the proposal is raised at the Company’s annual meeting in 2008.

MANNER AND COST OF SOLICITATION

The Board of Directors of Central Garden & Pet Company is sending you this proxy statement in connection with its solicitation of proxies for use at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Certain directors, officers and employees of the Company may solicit proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors by mail, phone, fax or in person. All expenses in connection with the solicitation of this proxy, including the charges of brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries for forwarding documents to stockholders, will be paid by the Company.

Dated: December 29, 2006

By Order of the Board of Directors

Stuart W. Booth, Secretary

21

(Continued from other side)